This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

AI is supposed to make healthcare more efficient. Less documentation. Faster chart review. Better triage. Smarter monitoring. Fewer administrative bottlenecks.

But efficiency and savings are not the same thing.

A new NEJM Catalyst article from Bob Kocher, Brian Zhao, and Erin Duffy makes the point clearly: AI may improve clinical workflows, expand access, and reduce labor costs, but whether that lowers spending depends on the reimbursement model it gets plugged into.

Under fee-for-service, faster workflows can quickly become more billable activity…

Full breakdown in my latest Huddle+ article here.

Huddle+ Members Only

Want to go deeper? Upgrade to Huddle+

Get exclusive courses, expert analysis, and the tools to understand how healthcare really works—from AI to policy to the business of medicine.

Upgrade Now
Premium courses & guides
Community access
Weekly insights

Reply

Avatar

or to participate